Only 42% of Victorians rate the Victorian Police highly for their ethics and honesty
The fourth Roy Morgan Snap SMS survey on Victoria’s Stage 4 restrictions shows only 42% of Victorians rate the Victorian Police either ‘Very high’ (11%) or ‘High’ (31%) for honesty and ethical standards. 25% rate the Police either ‘Low’ (13%) or ‘Very low’ (12%). A further 33% are in the middle and award the Police an Average rating for ethics and honesty.
The fourth Roy Morgan Snap SMS survey on Victoria’s Stage 4 restrictions shows only 42% of Victorians rate the Victorian Police either ‘Very high’ (11%) or ‘High’ (31%) for honesty and ethical standards. 25% rate the Police either ‘Low’ (13%) or ‘Very low’ (12%). A further 33% are in the middle and award the Police an Average rating for ethics and honesty.
Women rate the ethics and honesty of Victorian Police more highly than do men, with 46% of women rating Victorian Police either ‘Very high’ (12%) or ‘High’ (34%) compared to 38% of men rating either ‘Very high’ (11%) or ‘High’ (27%).
Older Victorians have a more positive view of the Victorian Police than their younger counterparts with 54% of 50-64 year olds, 45% of 35-49 year olds and people aged 65+ rating them either ‘Very high’ or ‘High’ compared to only 31% for those aged under 35.
This research on the view of Victorians on the ethics and honesty of Victorian Police was conducted after several videos involving people allegedly breaking State of Emergency laws throughout Victoria were publicised in the media, including the arrest of a pregnant woman in her home in Ballarat and a woman being forcibly removed from her car after refusing to provide her driver’s license.
In the Roy Morgan Image of Professions survey in 2017 Victorians rated Police as the 8th most trusted profession with 76% of respondents awarding the Police ‘Very high’ (27%) or ‘High’ (49%) marks. Police were behind only Nurses, Doctors, Pharmacists, School Teachers, Engineers, Dentists and State Supreme Court Judges.
An increasing majority of 55% of (up 2% in a week) say Melbourne residents should now be able to visit the homes of immediate family members. There are majorities of women (53%), men (58%), Melburnians (56%), Country Victorians (54%) and – for the first time – all age groups agree they should be able to visit.
Victorians are now evenly split on whether Melburnians should now be able to travel more than 5km from home with 50% saying yes (up 4% in a week) and 50% saying no (down 4%).
However, among Melbournians an increased majority of 53% say they should be free to travel more than 5 km from their home – up from 50% a week ago. This compares to slightly more than a third of people in Country Victoria (36%) who say Melburnians should now be able to travel more than 5km from home. This is again the largest gap between Melburnians and Country Victorians of any question.
People surveyed were each asked the following questions to determine their attitudes towards the current Victorian Government Stage 4 directives with changes compared to a week ago.
- Question 1: “Melbourne residents are currently banned from visiting the homes of immediate family members with the exception of singles, delivering care or essential services. Should Melbourne residents now be able to visit the homes of their immediate families?” Yes 55% (up 2% from a week ago) cf. No 45% (down 2%).
- Question 2: “At present Melbourne has a curfew from 9pm to 5am, should the curfew end now or not?” Yes 35% (down 2%) cf. No 65% (up 2%).
- Question 3: “Melbourne residents are currently restricted from travelling more than 5km from their homes for exercise or buying essential items such as food. Should Melbourne residents now be free to travel more than 5km from their home?” Yes 50% (up 4%) cf. No 50% (down 4%).
- Question 4 (NEW QUESTION): “From what you know or have heard, how would you rate Victorian Police for honesty and ethical standards?” Very High (11%), High (31%), Average (33%), Low (13%), Very Low (12%).
Support for the night-time curfew from 9pm to 5am remains strong with 65% of Victorians saying the curfew in Melbourne should not end compared to 35% who say it should.
This special Roy Morgan Snap SMS survey was conducted with a Victoria-wide cross-section of 2,278 Victorians aged 18+ conducted on Tuesday September 15 – Wednesday September 16, 2020.
The survey was conducted six weeks after the introduction of stringent Stage 4 restrictions in Melbourne and a week after Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews announced a two-week extension to the Stage 4 lockdown. The current restrictions are now due to end in just over two weeks’ time although Country Victoria has scored a reprieve with restrictions wound back to Stage 2 level this week.
ALP & L-NP supporters have the same views on Victorian Police, but L-NP supporters want to be able to visit their immediate families, and the end of travel restrictions and the night-time curfew
Nearly half of ALP supporters (46%) and L-NP supporters (46%) rate the police either ‘Very high’ or ‘High’ for ethics and honesty compared to 41% of Greens supporters.
However, there are large gaps between L-NP supporters and ALP supporters when it comes to the Stage 4 restrictions including visiting their immediate families, ending travel restrictions and the night-time curfew.
- A large majority of 71% (up 2% in a week) of L-NP supporters say Melburnians should now be able to visit the homes of their immediate families compared to 46% (down 4%) of ALP supporters and 53% (up 18%) of Greens supporters;
- Two-thirds of L-NP supporters 66% (up 9%) say Melbourne residents should now be able to travel more than 5km from their home compared to 38% (down 8%) of ALP supporters and just 34% (down 1%) of Greens supporters;
- For the first time a slim majority of L-NP supporters 52% (up 11%) say the Melbourne night-time curfew from 9pm-5am should end now compared to just 27% (down 5%) of ALP supporters and only 24% (down 6%) of Greens supporters.
Roy Morgan CEO Michele Levine says Victorian Police have been attracting a degree of controversy in recent weeks in the wake of several videos highlighted by the media of alleged COVID-19 lawbreakers being subject to potentially ‘heavy-handed’ police action:
“The Victorian Police have been under the spotlight in recent weeks with videos circulating of a pregnant woman in Ballarat being arrested at home for a Facebook post, old ladies being confronted on park benches for not wearing masks, a woman being forcibly removed from her car after refusing to provide her driver’s license and a man under arrest in Epping who appeared to have his head stomped by one of the arresting police officers and was subsequently put into an induced coma.
“It should be recognised that the police officer accused of stomping on the man under arrest in Epping has been suspended and is now under criminal investigation for the actions taken during the arrest by the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission.
“Given the media attention paid to these incidents in locked down Melbourne it is no surprise that fewer Victorians than three years ago rate the Police either ‘Very high’ or ‘High’ for ethics and honesty – now at 42%. This compares to a record high 76% in mid-2017 in the nationally conducted Roy Morgan Image of Professions survey.
“Views on the Victorian Police are nearly identical for ALP and L-NP supporters, but younger Victorians are the least likely to rate the ‘Police highly. Only 31% of Victorians aged under 35 rate the Police either ‘Very high’ (4%) or ‘High’ (27%) for ethics and honesty while 32% rate them either ‘Low’ (16%) or ‘Very low’ (16%) – easily the highest of any age group.
“When it comes to the Stage 4 restrictions the gap continues to widen between L-NP supporters and ALP supporters. A majority of L-NP supporters want to be able to visit the homes of their immediate family members (71%), travel freely around Melbourne (66%) and an end to the 9pm-5am night-time curfew (52%). Majorities of ALP supporters say all three of these restrictions should continue.”
Question 1:Should Melbourne residents now be able to visit the homes of their immediate families?
By Party Vote (Federal)
Source: Roy Morgan Special Snap SMS Poll of Victorians conducted on Tuesday September 15 to Wednesday September 16, 2020, n=2,278 with over 1,000 respondents each asked 3 questions. Base: Victorians aged 18+.
Should Melbourne residents now be able to visit the homes of their immediate families?
By Gender & Age
Victorians 18+ | Gender | Age | ||||||||
Aug 25-26, 2020 |
Sep 1-2, 2020 |
Sep 8-9, 2020 |
Sep 15-16, 2020 |
Men | Women | Under 35 |
35-49 | 50-64 | 65+ | |
% | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | |
Yes | 43 | 47 | 53 | 55 | 58 | 53 | 53 | 52 | 61 | 59 |
No | 57 | 53 | 47 | 45 | 42 | 47 | 47 | 48 | 39 | 41 |
TOTAL | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Should Melbourne residents now be able to visit the homes of their immediate families?
By Melbourne & Country Victoria
Victorians 18+ |
Melbourne | Country Victoria | |
% | % | % | |
Yes | 55 | 56 | 54 |
No | 45 | 44 | 46 |
TOTAL | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Should Melbourne residents now be able to visit the homes of their immediate families?
By Party Vote (Federal)
Victorian |
Party Vote |
|||||
L-NP |
ALP |
Greens |
Ind/Others |
Can’t say |
||
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Yes |
56 |
71 |
46 |
53 |
56 |
48 |
No |
44 |
29 |
54 |
47 |
44 |
52 |
TOTAL |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Question 2:
From Sunday night Melbourne is to have a curfew from 9pm to 5am, should the curfew end or not?
By Gender & Age
Victorians 18+ |
Gender |
Age |
||||||||
Aug 25-26, |
Sep 1-2, |
Sep 8-9, |
Sep 15-16, |
Men |
Women |
Under |
35-49 |
50-64 |
65+ |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Yes |
28 |
39 |
37 |
35 |
41 |
29 |
36 |
36 |
33 |
34 |
No |
72 |
61 |
63 |
65 |
59 |
71 |
64 |
64 |
67 |
66 |
TOTAL |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
From Sunday night Melbourne is to have a curfew from 9pm to 5am, should the curfew end or not?
By Melbourne & Country Victoria
Victorians |
Melbourne |
Country Victoria |
|
% |
% |
% |
|
Yes |
35 |
37 |
29 |
No |
65 |
63 |
71 |
TOTAL |
100 |
100 |
100 |
From Sunday night Melbourne is to have a curfew from 9pm to 5am, should the curfew end or not?
By Party Vote (Federal)
Victorian |
Party Vote |
|||||
L-NP |
ALP |
Greens |
Ind/Others |
Can’t say |
||
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Yes |
35 |
52 |
27 |
24 |
40 |
27 |
No |
65 |
48 |
73 |
76 |
60 |
73 |
TOTAL |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Question 3:
Should Melbourne residents now be free to travel more than 5km from their home?
By Gender & Age
Victorians 18+ |
Gender |
Age |
||||||||
Aug 25-26, |
Sep 1-2, |
Sep 8-9, |
Sep 15-16, |
Men |
Women |
Under |
35-49 |
50-64 |
65+ |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Yes |
29 |
40 |
46 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
48 |
49 |
47 |
58 |
No |
71 |
60 |
54 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
52 |
51 |
53 |
42 |
TOTAL |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Should Melbourne residents now be free to travel more than 5km from their home?
By Melbourne & Country Victoria
Victorians |
Melbourne |
Country Victoria |
|
% |
% |
% |
|
Yes |
50 |
53 |
36 |
No |
50 |
47 |
64 |
TOTAL |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Should Melbourne residents now be free to travel more than 5km from their home?
By Party Vote (Federal)
Victorian |
Party Vote |
|||||
L-NP |
ALP |
Greens |
Ind/Others |
Can’t say |
||
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Yes |
49 |
66 |
38 |
34 |
58 |
62 |
No |
51 |
34 |
62 |
66 |
42 |
38 |
TOTAL |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Question 4:
Ratings of Victorian Police for honesty and ethical standards by Gender & Age
Source: Roy Morgan Special Snap SMS Poll of Victorians conducted on Tuesday September 15 to Wednesday September 16, 2020, n=2,278 with over 1,000 respondents each asked 3 questions. Base: Victorians aged 18+.
From what you know or have heard, how would you rate Victorian Police for honesty and ethical standards? By Gender & Age
Victorians 18+ |
Gender |
Age |
|||||
Sep 15-16, |
Men |
Women |
Under |
35-49 |
50-64 |
65+ |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Very High |
11 |
11 |
12 |
4 |
14 |
20 |
13 |
High |
31 |
27 |
34 |
27 |
31 |
34 |
32 |
TOTAL High or Very High |
42 |
38 |
46 |
31 |
45 |
54 |
45 |
Average |
33 |
32 |
35 |
37 |
32 |
27 |
35 |
Low |
13 |
15 |
10 |
16 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
Very Low |
12 |
15 |
9 |
16 |
12 |
8 |
9 |
TOTAL Low or Very Low |
25 |
30 |
19 |
32 |
23 |
19 |
20 |
TOTAL |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
From what you know or have heard, how would you rate Victorian Police for honesty and ethical standards? By Melbourne & Country Victoria
Victorians |
Melbourne |
Country Victoria |
|
% |
% |
% |
|
Very High |
11 |
11 |
12 |
High |
31 |
30 |
34 |
TOTAL High or Very High |
42 |
41 |
46 |
Average |
33 |
34 |
30 |
Low |
13 |
13 |
13 |
Very Low |
12 |
12 |
11 |
TOTAL Low or Very Low |
25 |
25 |
24 |
TOTAL |
100 |
100 |
100 |
From what you know or have heard, how would you rate Victorian Police for honesty and ethical standards? By Party Vote (Federal)
Victorian Electors |
Party Vote | |||||
L-NP | ALP | Greens | Ind/Others | Can’t say | ||
% | % | % | % | % | % | |
Very High | 13 | 15 | 14 | 9 | 7 | 7 |
High | 32 | 31 | 32 | 32 | 39 | 36 |
TOTAL High or Very High | 45 | 46 | 46 | 41 | 46 | 43 |
Average | 31 | 32 | 30 | 31 | 35 | 27 |
Low | 12 | 13 | 13 | 9 | 6 | 16 |
Very Low | 12 | 9 | 11 | 19 | 13 | 14 |
TOTAL Low or Very Low | 24 | 22 | 24 | 28 | 19 | 30 |
TOTAL | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Margin of Error
The margin of error to be allowed for in any estimate depends mainly on the number of interviews on which it is based. Margin of error gives indications of the likely range within which estimates would be 95% likely to fall, expressed as the number of percentage points above or below the actual estimate. Allowance for design effects (such as stratification and weighting) should be made as appropriate.
Sample Size | Percentage Estimate |
40% – 60% | 25% or 75% | 10% or 90% | 5% or 95% | |
1,000 | ±3.0 | ±2.7 | ±1.9 | ±1.3 |
5,000 | ±1.4 | ±1.2 | ±0.8 | ±0.6 |
7,500 | ±1.1 | ±1.0 | ±0.7 | ±0.5 |
10,000 | ±1.0 | ±0.9 | ±0.6 | ±0.4 |
20,000 | ±0.7 | ±0.6 | ±0.4 | ±0.3 |
50,000 | ±0.4 | ±0.4 | ±0.3 | ±0.2 |